SCAO Dashboard
Sign In
Information for...
Search
Bookmark and Share
Print

​Michigan Supreme Court

State Court Administrative Office Dashboard

 

This dashboard identifies many of SCAO's current performance goals and our progress towards those goals. SCAO uses it to assess its effectiveness, to improve services, and to communicate its goals and accomplishments with the public. The measures are organized by topic area. Within each topic, you will find a description of Why It Matters and links to more information. If you have any questions about SCAO's dashboard, please contact the Statistical Research Division.  

 

<><> 
Timeliness: Justice Without Delays ​ ​ ​ ​

​Clearance Rate

 ​Prior ​Current ​Target ​Progress
​Why it Matters ​ ​ ​ ​

Circuit Court - Felony

 ​101% ​100% ​100% ​

Circuit Court - Civil

 ​99% ​99% ​100% ​

Circuit Court-Family Division-Divorce

 ​102% ​102% ​100% ​

​Circuit Court-Family Division-Delinquency

 ​99% ​101% ​100% ​

​Circuit Court-Family Division-Child Protective

 ​97% 97%​ ​100% ​

​Probate Court-Estate, Trust
​96%
 99% ​100% ​

​Probate Court-Guardianship, Conservatorship

 ​98% ​99% 100%​ ​

​Probate Court-Mental Illness, Judicial Admission

 ​97% ​99% ​100% ​
​District Court-Felony ​99% ​100% ​100% ​
​District Court-Misdemeanor ​105% ​99% ​100% ​
​District Court-Civil Infraction ​100% 103%​ ​100% ​
​District Court-General Civil ​107% ​96% ​100% ​

​Case Age Disposition Rate

 ​Prior ​Current ​Target ​Progress
​Why it Matters ​ ​ ​ ​
​Circuit Court-Felony 96.4% ​96.9% ​100%
​Circuit Court-Civil 92.6% ​93.8% ​100%

​Circuit Court-Family Division-Divorce

 93.8% ​94.6% ​100%

​Circuit Court-Family Division-Delinquency

 89.1% ​90.9% ​100%

​​Circuit Court-Family Division-Child Protective

 68.5% ​81.6% ​100%
​Probate Court-Estate,Trust 89.7% ​90.2% ​100%

​Probate Court-Guardianship, Conservatorship

 97.2% ​97.2% ​100% =

​Probate Court-Mental Illness, Judicial Admission

 98.6% ​98.5% ​100%
​​District Court-Felony NA​ ​76.5%​ ​100%​ NA​
​District Court-Misdemeanor 93.0% ​92.7% ​100%
District Court-Civil Infraction​ 75.3% ​77.4% ​100%
District Court-General Civil 98.1% 98.6% 100%

Efficiency: Coordination and Consolidation​

​ ​Prior ​Current Target ​Progress
Why it Matters ​ ​ ​ ​
Overjudged circuits​ 29 32 ​0   
​Underjudged circuits 8 4​ 0​   

​Overjudged 3rd class district courts

 ​9 11​ 0​   

​Underjudged 3rd class district courts

 ​3 2​ 0​
​Concurrent jurisdiction plans ​59 78​ 243​  
​Consolidated administration ​15 15​ 243​ ​=
​Multi-court chief judges ​34 36​ 60​  

 

Technology: Supporting Timeliness, Efficiency, Access​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
​ ​Prior Current ​Target ​Progress
Why it Matters​ ​ ​ ​ ​
E-filing​ 6 6 83​ ​=

​Court locations using Judicial Information Systems

 ​246 251​ 317​ ​

​Agencies accessing Judicial Data Warehouse (JDW)

 ​15 16​ NA​ ​
​Courts uploading data to JDW ​233 239​ 245​ ​
​Inquiries to JDW 128,109 223,223​ NA​ ​
​Videoconferencing technology 61 93 319​ ​
​E-payments 79 79​ 243​ =​
 
Performance: Court Metrics and Evidence-Based Practices​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
​ ​Prior ​Current ​Target Progress
​Why it Matters ​ ​ ​ ​
Court dashboards​ 11 ​17 ​245 ​

​Collections programs rated adequate or better

 231 ​265 ​312
​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​Sobriety and Drug Court Recidivism Rates ​ ​

 ​ ​
​Why it Matters ​ ​ ​ ​

​Sobriety court 2-year, drug/alcohol conviction
​10%
​3%
​0%

​Sobriety court 2-year, any new conviction
​16%
​4%
​0%
​

​Sobriety court 4-year, drug/alcohol conviction
​15%
​8%
​0%
​

​Sobriety court 4-year, any new conviction
18%
​10%
​0%

​District drug court 2-year, drug/alcohol conviction
10%​
​5%
0%​

​District drug court 2-year, any new conviction
​12%
6%
​0%
​

​District drug court 4-year, drug/alcohol conviction
​16%
​11%
​0%
​

​District drug court 4-year, any new conviction
​19%
​13%
0%​
​

​Circuit drug court 2-year, drug/alcohol conviction
​12%
​7%
​0%
​

Circuit drug court 2-year, any new conviction
​18%
10%
0%​

​Circuit drug court 4-year, drug/alcohol conviction
​20%
​16%
​0%
​

​Circuit drug court 4-year, any new conviction

 29% ​23% 0%​ ​
   
Effective Training for Effective Courts​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
​ ​Prior ​Current ​Target ​Progress
Why it Matters​ ​ ​ ​ ​
​Judge attendance at programs ​734 962 ​NA      

​Judges attending at least 1 program

 273 309 ​619     

​Program rated above average or excellent

 ​89% ​88% ​100%    
  
Access: Connecting Courts and the Public​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
​ ​Prior ​Current ​Target ​Progress
​Why it Matters ​ ​ ​ ​

​Website rated easy or very easy to use

 42% NA ​100% ​NA

​Certified court interpreters

 ​59 ​61 ​NA

​Cases disposed by community dispute resolution centers

 14,656 ​14,715 ​NA

​Settlement rate for community dispute resolution

 ​66% ​68% ​70%

 

 

​Staff Contact

Laura Hutzel

hutzell@courts.mi.gov

(517) 373-2222

 

 

Performance improving
= Performance about the same
​Performance declining
 
 ​ At or over 100%
 ​ 90 to 99%
Less than 90%