Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Version HistoryVersion History

Name

Chapter-6-Criminal-Procedure

Title

Chapter 6 Criminal Procedure

Comments

 

Contact

COURT\boudroj

Contact E-Mail Address

 

Contact Name

 

Contact Picture

 

Rollup Image

 

Target Audiences

No targeting

Page Title

 

Body Copy 2A

​Chapter 6  Criminal Procedure

 

2013-21 - Amendments clarify how a prosecutor's notice of enhanced sentence required by MCL 769.13(1) is to be provided in courts when arraignment has been eliminated under MCR 6.113(E)

Adopted: Amendments of MCR 6.112 and MCR 6.113  (effective immediately, pending public comment period and public hearing)
Issued: ​April 23, 2014
Comment Period Expiration: ​August 1, 2014
Public Hearing: ​To be scheduled.
 

 

Comments:

  
Retained or Other Action:
Issued:
​Effective:
 

 2012-11 -  Proposal would add a harmless-error provision identical to that in FR Crim P 11(h)

Proposed Amendment: Proposed Amendment of MCR 6.302
Issued: ​November 6, 2013
Comment Period Expiration: ​March 1, 2014
Public Hearing: ​To be scheduled.
 

Comments:

 
 
 
 
Adopted or Other Action:
​Issued:
​Effective:
 
 
 

  

 

2013-18 - Proposed Videoconferencing Rules 

 
Proposed Amendment:​ Proposed Amendments of MCR 3.210, 3.215, and 6.104 and Proposed New MCR 8.124
Issued: ​May 1, 2013
Comment Period Expiration: ​September 1, 2013
​Public Hearing: ​September 25, 2013
 

 Comments:

 
 

 

 
Adopted or Other Action:
​Issued:
​Effective:
 

 

 

2011-19 - pROPOSAL WOULD ELIMINATE WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA BY DEFENDANT IF DEFENDANT AND PROSECUTOR AGREE THAT PROSECUTOR WILL RECOMMEND A PARTICULAR SENTENCE, BUT THE COURT CHOOSES TO IMPOSE A SENTENCE GREATER THAN THE RECOMMENDATION; ALSO, THE PROPOSAL WOULD CLARIFY THAT A DEFENDANT'S MISCONDUCT COMMITTED BETWEEN PLEA ACCEPTANCE AND DEFENDANT'S SENTENCING MAY RESULT IN FORFEITURE OF DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO WITHDRAW PLEA IN EITHER A cOBBS OR kILLEBREW cASE 

 

Proposed Amendment:

Proposed Amendments of MCR 6.302 and MCR 6.310
​Issued: ​November 7, 2012
Comment Period Expiration: ​March 1, 2013
Public Hearing: ​May 29, 2013
 

 

 

Comments:

 
 

 

 
Adopted or Other Action: Amendments of Rule 6.302 and Rule 6.310 of the Michigan Court Rules
​Issued: ​September 18, 2013
​Effective: ​January 1, 2014
 

 

 
 
 

2010-34 - Alternative Proposals regarding motion for directed verdict (Alternative A allows trial court to reserve judgment on motion for directed verdict; alternative b allows trial court to reconsider its decision to grant directed verdict)

Proposed Amendment: Proposed Amendment of MCR 6.419​
​​Issued: May 2, 2012
Comment Period Expiration:
​September 1, 2012
Public Hearing: September 27, 2012
 
 Comments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adopted or Other Action:
Issued: ​May 2, 2013
Effective: ​September 1, 2013
 
 
 
 

Body Copy 2B

Body Copy 3A

Body Copy 3B

Body Copy 1A

Related Links 3A

Related Links 1A

Feature Image 2A

Feature Image 3A

Body Copy 1B

Collection Links 01

Collection Links 02

Collection Links 03

Collection Links 04

Collection Links 05

Collection Links 06

Collection Links 07

Collection Links 08

Collection Links 09

Collection Title 01

Collection Title 02

Collection Title 03

Collection Title 04

Collection Title 05

Collection Title 06

Collection Title 07

Collection Title 08

Collection Title 09

MSC Article Date

 

MSC Article Byline

 

HTMLKeywords

 

Collection Title 5a

Court

 

Body Copy 2C

Body Copy 2D

Body Copy 3D

Body Copy 4D

Content Type: MSC Layout
Version: 99.0
Created at 5/2/2012 8:48 PM by COURT\boudroj
Last modified at 4/23/2014 10:38 AM by COURT\LacrossS